Yes, but it possible that JA doesn't think well of anyone she really loves! After all, we have an existence proof that least some people JA does not think well of that she really loves.
We comprise, at minimum, one priest, one philosopher, and one doctor. (The jokes practically write themselves.)
Doing our best to combat the tragic dearth of opinions in the Blogosphere. Happy you stopped by. Patiently awaiting the book deal that is sure to drop any day now.
We Will Go On
-
My dear little boys. When you went to bed Tuesday night, begging to see how
the election would turn out, I told you we’d find out in the morning. Well,
I n...
The Years Of Writing Dangerously
-
Thirteen years ago, as I was starting to experiment with this blogging
thing, I wrote the following: [T]he speed with which an idea in your head
reaches th...
-
This blog is now resident within the online magazine *Ordinary Times*.
Editor-in-Chief Erik Kain introduces the newly-revamped blog -- which looks
really...
No Party Time in Yemen
-
Before I get to this, in a post below I asked what we should be calling the
people in the street- demonstrators? protestors? revolutionaires?- and
Anonymou...
One wonders if the intersection of the two sets contains any members.
ReplyDeleteI know! I love that there are necessarily members of the first set who do not belong to the second.
ReplyDeleteYes, but it possible that JA doesn't think well of anyone she really loves! After all, we have an existence proof that least some people JA does not think well of that she really loves.
ReplyDelete