Yes, but it possible that JA doesn't think well of anyone she really loves! After all, we have an existence proof that least some people JA does not think well of that she really loves.
We comprise, at minimum, one priest, one philosopher, and one doctor. (The jokes practically write themselves.)
Doing our best to combat the tragic dearth of opinions in the Blogosphere. Happy you stopped by. Patiently awaiting the book deal that is sure to drop any day now.
Your Brain In Space
-
Amid all the shocking and depressing news regarding the future of American
healthcare and medicine, at least over the next four years, I thought I
would ...
Coping during COVID-19 wave one
-
During normal times, I consume a lot of research. I enjoy dissecting not
just the result, but how the analysts got to their answers. What biases can
I find...
It Is Accomplished
-
As Gandhi never quite said, First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you.
Then they attack you. Then you win. I remember one of the first TV debates
I had...
-
This blog is now resident within the online magazine *Ordinary Times*.
Editor-in-Chief Erik Kain introduces the newly-revamped blog -- which looks
really ...
No Party Time in Yemen
-
Before I get to this, in a post below I asked what we should be calling the
people in the street- demonstrators? protestors? revolutionaires?- and
Anonymou...
One wonders if the intersection of the two sets contains any members.
ReplyDeleteI know! I love that there are necessarily members of the first set who do not belong to the second.
ReplyDeleteYes, but it possible that JA doesn't think well of anyone she really loves! After all, we have an existence proof that least some people JA does not think well of that she really loves.
ReplyDelete