One thing is also increasingly clear from the torture memos: medical professionals were indeed present throughout the torture sessions, carefully monitoring and measuring the health and suffering of the torture victims. There is no conceivable way in which this is compatible with the Hippocratic oath, or with minimal standards of medical ethics. They were there to ensure that pain was maximized short of death or permanent visible injury. They failed in the score of cases where torture victims died by the Pentagon's own admission - and in the over a hundred deaths-by-torture recorded by human rights organizations. These doctors need to be identified and prevented from ever practising medicine again.
Posts
Lysenkoism 2.0 continues: Podcast Jay wants to turn NIH into the “research
arm” of MAHA
-
NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya has recently said that he wants to transform
the NIH into the "research arm of MAHA" and a "central driver of the MAHA
agen...
4 hours ago
Just as a general question, do you really think that it would be better to torture without doctors present? Probably the death toll would be higher, and permanent injury would certainly rise. Anyway, the current Administration has decided to torture away, so the question isn't hypothetical.
ReplyDeleteThis is a helpful information shared by you.
ReplyDeleteIn different archives, above all in lawful agreements, an addendum is an extra report excluded from the principle part of the agreement.